The three phases and every instrument in its place — in Farqad's words
Self-Evaluation Course: Unit Two
12 lessons
60 minutes
Twelve lessons that walk the team from its forming to the improvement plan: who does what in each phase, how each instrument is run by its rules and quotas, and how the report becomes a plan that runs. Each lesson has a check question and a screen in "Farqad" where the idea is practised with confidence and precision.
By the end of this track you will be able to…
Place every party in its phase and know what is asked of it
Tell a fact from an opinion before you gather a single datum
Run each instrument by its rules and its quotas, not by guesswork
Turn the final report into an improvement plan that runs and is followed up
1
Lesson 1
Three Phases, One School Community
Self-evaluation runs in three successive phases, and the team does not work alone in them: the principal, the teaching and administrative staff, learners and families each have a part. "Farqad" lays the three phases out on the school's journey, so everyone knows their position clearly and moves steadily.
Preparation and planning: the team is formed and trained, the plan built, the culture spread
Delivery: the readiness form, then the instruments and data gathering, then the final report and priorities
Improvement, development and sustainability: the priorities become a plan with goals, programmes, an owner and follow-up
A phase is a gate, not a label: no instrument opens before a trained team, and no plan is built before a report has been read.
Check: in which phase is the readiness form filled in?
Delivery. The readiness form is its first prelude, describing the school's reality before any instrument is run.
Preparation is shared by four parties, each with a definite list. Whoever knows their list does not wait for others, and whoever knows the others' lists does not ask them for what is not theirs. "Farqad" records the team's roles on its page, so a task is assigned easily and followed precisely.
Group
Its role
The principal
Reads the framework, registers on the platform, attends the training, forms and empowers the team, presents the plan to the education office, and raises queries
The self-evaluation team
Reads the guide and the instruments, trains as needed, builds the work plan and presents it, meets learners and families, and spreads the culture through the school's site
Teaching and administrative staff
Reads the framework, attends the briefing and workshops, learns the instruments, cooperates honestly in gathering evidence, and briefs families and learners
Learners and families
Attend the briefings and cooperate with the team when the instruments are run
The four parties of preparation and what is asked of each
Check: who presents the work plan to the education office?
The principal. The team builds the plan and presents it to the school's staff; the principal presents it to the office.
The team is chosen on seven stated criteria drawn from the evaluator's competences: academic, professional and personal. Choosing on a written criterion protects the team from nomination by impression, and makes every name on it easy to defend.
Motivation to improve, and a habit of critical, reflective thinking
A working knowledge of evaluation methods and aims, and experience and distinction in teaching
Strong communication with others, and confident use of a computer
A spread of specialisms in proportions that serve an accurate evaluation on time
The team is trained after its need is known, by interview or questionnaire, not before. In "Farqad" the need is chosen from the same skill list, so training is built on a measured need.
Check: a member is nominated for being the longest-serving in the school. Which criterion supports that?
None. The seven criteria ask about motivation, thinking, knowledge, experience, communication, computing and specialism, not seniority.
The team keeps one file of what documents the running of self-evaluation, in eight components. The file is not an archive filled at the end; it is built with each phase. "Farqad" assembles the file from the readiness form and the instruments on its own, so it is complete the moment it is needed and at no extra effort.
General school data, and learner, teacher and learning-environment data with their numbers and ratios
Attainment and achievement reports, and reports on the building's condition and the safety of its equipment
The documents of each domain, and the improvement plan template
The self-evaluation file page in "Farqad" shows the eight components and which are complete, reading each from its source on the platform.
Check: what does the learner data in the file include?
Numbers, attainment, economic status, and attendance rates.
Before the team gathers a single datum it needs a skill that comes before every instrument: telling a fact from an opinion. Evidence that holds is a fact that can be proved; an opinion is backed by something else or left aside. "Farqad" ties every piece of evidence to its indicator and its source, so it is read with confidence and never mistaken for an opinion.
A fact describes a real event that can be proved, and rests on direct observation
An opinion expresses belief or feeling, and differs from one person to another
A survey answer is an opinion; a document or an observation is a fact — which is why a survey is read beside other instruments
Face of comparison
Fact
Opinion
What it is
A statement describing a real event or an existing thing
A statement expressing belief or feeling
Objectivity
Objective
Subjective
How it is tested
It can be proved and demonstrated
It is not proved, only attributed to whoever holds it
Its words
Descriptive
Carry value words
Open to debate
No
Yes
The faces on which a fact and an opinion are compared, and against which every piece of evidence is tested before it is accepted
Check: "The teachers are satisfied with the leadership." Fact or opinion?
An opinion. It expresses a feeling and differs from one teacher to another. It becomes evidence when a survey figure, a document or an observation backs it.
The three surveys open the delivery phase — for learners, teachers and families — and cover administration, teaching and learning, and learning outcomes. They run first because the later instruments interpret what they surface. "Farqad" distributes the survey and counts its responses in real time, so the result is read easily and with confidence.
No names, and transparent answers with confidentiality guaranteed
Every learner and every teacher takes part, not a sample chosen for convenience
The cheapest instrument and the lightest on the respondent's time and effort
Its limit: the answer is only as good as the respondent's understanding and experience, and may be incomplete
Problem
Remedy
Target groups do not take part
The principal motivates every group on why their view matters
Some learners do not understand the survey's terms
The invitation says a parent may help explain
Some learners fear answering frankly
The message says no name is needed and the answers stay confidential
Three problems recur in filling surveys, and each has a practical remedy
Check: why are the surveys run before the interviews and the observation?
Because the later instruments interpret what the survey surfaces. An interview before the survey has nothing to interpret.
A document is any written, audio or visual material, on paper or electronic, that carries information about an event. The team gathers and reviews it; it does not store it. The guide lists the documents in four families, and "Farqad" seeds the whole list in the document analysis register, so the team knows precisely what it has and what it lacks.
Administration: the operational plan, student guidance and discipline, indicator follow-up, activity, professional development, and enrichment programmes
Safety: the safety plan, the evacuation plan and its assessment, equipment forms, and training forms
Teaching effectiveness: samples of portfolios, activities, progress records, assessment forms, and teachers' self-evaluation reports
Learning outcomes: discipline reports, health-promoting programmes, enrichment programmes, and reports of participations and competitions
The list is seeded once into the register, and each document is reviewed in its turn; the analysis is complete when every document on the list is reviewed, not when it is uploaded.
Check: a sample of learner portfolios belongs to which family?
Teaching effectiveness. It is the family of samples: the team gathers a sample of the document and studies it, not every document.
The classroom visit is for self-evaluation alone, and no other purpose shares it. Six rules govern it, and a quota per subject sets the number of visits. "Farqad" shows the quotas above the register and counts a visit only after two independent forms, so no incomplete visit is counted.
Two observers at least, each filing their own independent form
A subject specialist where possible; otherwise the principal assigns whoever is suitable
The teacher is told the visit does not touch their job appraisal
The whole lesson, with no intervention and no remarks during it
Subject
Visits per stage
Mathematics, science, Arabic, and a subject the school chooses
Two
Islamic studies, and social studies
One
Visits owed per subject for one stage, doubled with each additional stage
The quotas add up to ten visits for one stage in the training programme; the latest edition of the procedural guide raises the floor to fifteen. "Farqad" follows the guide for the floor and the programme for the spread across subjects.
Check: one observer filed two forms for one visit. Is it complete?
No. The rule asks for two different observers, each with their own form; one observer with two forms is one observer.
The observation card names the practices the observer looks for, and all of them ask about the teacher's effect on the learner, not the teacher's own performance. What is written is written as facts: what happened, not what was inferred. In "Farqad" the observer marks each practice met or not met, so agreement and disagreement between observers is read clearly.
Equal opportunities for every group of learners, and a climate that draws everyone into taking part
Activities that grow literacy, numeracy, higher thinking, social and digital skills, and a blend of classroom and online learning
Varied strategies, varied assessment that is analysed and used, and prompt, constructive feedback
The note describes facts, focuses on what the learner does, uses quantified rather than vague phrasing, and avoids complex terms
Three note-taking tools: a running record of events, an anecdotal record of what the teacher and learner said as evidence, and checklists for how often a behaviour recurs in set intervals.
Check: the observer wrote "the teacher is competent". Is that a proper note?
No. That is an inference. The proper note describes what happened: "the teacher answered six learner questions and referred two to the sources".
The environment walk reads the physical school in eight areas, from safety and security to toilets and their supplies. The walk answers one question: does the place serve learning? "Farqad" opens the eight areas in one card with their photographs, so the walk is documented easily and read precisely.
Safety, security and maintenance in place and working
Classrooms organised, and laboratories available with their equipment
Learning resources and digital technology within the learner's reach
Courtyards and sports equipment, a canteen and seating, facilities for the disabled, and toilets with their supplies
A shortfall in one area of the walk is read in the teaching-and-learning indicators too, not in the environment alone; unusable laboratories hold up delivering the curriculum.
Check: the laboratories are unusable. Which indicator is affected first?
4-1-1-3 in the school environment, and with it 2-1-1-2 in teaching and learning, because delivering the curriculum needs the laboratory.
An interview is a guided conversation to gather information on a set subject, with four groups: learners and teachers in focus groups, the counsellor and the principal alone. Five requirements make it gather rather than judge. "Farqad" carries the question bank for each group and splits the roles, so the interview is run with confidence and recorded precisely.
Read the questions beforehand and know which indicator and standard stand behind each
Add a question when an answer opens a door, as long as it stays tied to the indicator
Keep to the planned time, and split the team: a speaker who asks and a scribe who writes
Say at the start that the interview gathers information about the school's performance, not about the person
The principal and the counsellor are met alone; teachers and learners in focus groups, where learning outcomes show in the group's talk rather than the individual's.
Check: who writes during the interview?
The scribe. The speaker asks and listens, the scribe writes; whoever does both loses half the answers.
The final report is printed from the platform, and from it the strengths and improvement areas of each domain are drawn, then the development issues and priorities. From there the improvement, development and sustainability plan is built on four qualities. "Farqad" reads the priorities straight from the results, so the plan is built on what was recorded, not on what was expected.
Clarity: goals and steps every member of the school understands
Flexibility: it changes when an obstacle blocks a programme
Resources: named before any programme is promised
Involvement: staff, families and the local community build it together
Goals are built on the school's own reality, needs and means, and phrased on the criteria of a good goal; then each programme is given an owner and a follow-up tool.
Check: a programme in the plan has no owner. Is the plan ready?
It is not. A programme needs an owner, a time and a follow-up tool; a programme with no owner is an intention, not a plan.